[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: attribute warn_unused_result
From: |
Andy Moreton |
Subject: |
Re: attribute warn_unused_result |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:08:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) |
On Thu 03 Feb 2011, Chad Brown wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
>>
>> Gnulib's ignore-value module is designed for that. I installed the
>> following:
>
> ..and it broke the W32 and nextstep builds (at least) again.
>
> I appreciate the ideas behind the gnulib inclusion, but it seems to be
> causing a lot more broken builds than we saw before. What can we do
> to fix this?
1) Prevail upon the developers in question to work in a more consensual
style and publicise changes that will break non-POSIX builds *before*
installing them.
2) Work on fixing the w32 build system so it is less hand-crafted and
makes more use of the POSIX build machinery. Given the number of
different environments and toolchains used to build for win32 targets,
this is tricky.
> I get the general impression via the 50+ message thread about DOS port
> compatibility that the gnulib people are mostly unwilling to make
> efforts to avoid breaking the emacs build. Is this the case, or are
> we simply seeing bad luck?
>
> So far, the features of gnulib have not seemed to be worth the
> trouble.
As long as it does not restrict portability of emacs to platforms and
toolchains that gnulib want to support then there is a little temporary
pain and some longer term benefits.
If the two projects have divergent views on which platforms and
toolchains to support then that would indeed be a problem.
AndyM
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, (continued)
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Stefan Monnier, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Lennart Borgman, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Stefan Monnier, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Lennart Borgman, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result,
Andy Moreton <=
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/03
Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/03
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Tom Tromey, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Tom Tromey, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Paul Eggert, 2011/02/04
- Re: attribute warn_unused_result, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/05