[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 00:01:32 +0100 |
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Philipp Haselwarter
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Why not have a font-lock-warning face and a font-lock-error face?
+1
And I would also like to see some set of "state" faces, like "wait",
"ready", etc.
- Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Chong Yidong, 2011/02/01
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Lennart Borgman, 2011/02/01
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Tim Cross, 2011/02/02
- RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Drew Adams, 2011/02/02
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Chong Yidong, 2011/02/02
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Philipp Haselwarter, 2011/02/02
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions,
Lennart Borgman <=
- RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Drew Adams, 2011/02/03
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Tim Cross, 2011/02/03
- RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Drew Adams, 2011/02/05
- RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Drew Adams, 2011/02/06
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Tim Cross, 2011/02/06
- RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Drew Adams, 2011/02/07
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Tim Cross, 2011/02/07
- RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Drew Adams, 2011/02/07
- Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Tim Cross, 2011/02/07
- RE: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions, Drew Adams, 2011/02/08