[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699 |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:29:42 +0200 |
I have a question for experts on X selections.
I think I can fix bug#7699 if I switch the order of calling
x-get-selection-value and x-get-selection in this snippet from
mouse-yank-primary:
(let ((primary
(cond
((fboundp 'x-get-selection-value) ; MS-DOS, MS-Windows and X.
(or (x-get-selection-value)
(x-get-selection 'PRIMARY)))
My question is: could switching the order do the wrong thing on X? I
looked into x-get-selection-value and x-get-selection as they are
implemented on X, and they seem to do very similar things, but I don't
know enough to understand the semantics of the subtle differences.
If switching the order is not TRT on X, I could do that only for w32.
TIA
- mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/12/21
- RE: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, Drew Adams, 2010/12/21
- Re: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/12/21
- RE: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, Drew Adams, 2010/12/21
- Re: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/22
- RE: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, Drew Adams, 2010/12/22
- Re: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/22
- RE: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, Drew Adams, 2010/12/22
Re: mouse-yank-primary and bug #7699, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/22