[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why there is no char type?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Why there is no char type? |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:12:55 -0500 |
> From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:57:40 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Leo writes:
>
> > As the subject line suggested.
>
> You're using the wrong 'macs, that's why.
Here we go again. Brace for it...
> Anyway, there will be one in Emacs 24, if I read the tea leaves
> correctly.
I don't see how could you conclude something like this, but maybe I'm
missing something.
- Why there is no char type?, Leo, 2010/12/14
- Why there is no char type?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/14
- Re: Why there is no char type?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Why there is no char type?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/14
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/15
- Re: Why there is no char type?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/15
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/16
- Re: Why there is no char type?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/16
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/16
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Leo, 2010/12/15
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Richard Stallman, 2010/12/15