[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:44:47 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > > For instance, coding-system-for-read being bound to nil and
> > > to `undecided' have different meanings.
> > You mean that `undecided' bypasses the various preferences?
> Yes.
What I actually meant is that if coding-system-for-read is
bound to undecided, insert-file-contents ignores coding:
tag, etc and always performs coding-system detection based
on the byte sequence of a file.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/11
- Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/11
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Kenichi Handa, 2010/12/13
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/13
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Kenichi Handa, 2010/12/13
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/13
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Kenichi Handa, 2010/12/13
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/14
- Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system, Kenichi Handa, 2010/12/14