[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Return
From: |
Samuel Bronson |
Subject: |
Re: Return |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:51:48 -0500 |
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Probably, in the case of add-on packages, it does not help that the
> > XEmacs packaging machinery is only intended for use with packages
> > stored in its own CVS tree...
>
> That is false. If somebody wants to use our packaging machinery for
> out of tree packaging, they are certainly welcome to do so. VM does
> it, for example. I among others would spend some effort to make that
> easier; I know it's rather awkward at the moment.
Er, I guess I should have made that clearer... I actually meant that
it seems that (more or less) needs to put *something* in the
xemacs-packages tree, and this is (I assume) not particularly fun
without CVS commit access. At least, none of my DVCSes seem to be able
to handle branching from CVS...
- Re: Keyword args, (continued)
- Re: Return, MON KEY, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/08
- Re: Return, MON KEY, 2010/12/08
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/09
- Re: Return, Samuel Bronson, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/08
- Re: Return,
Samuel Bronson <=