[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The window-pub branch
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: The window-pub branch |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:56:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
> But M-: then restores the original window selection and frame focus.
No. The frame focus is never changed so it is not restored.
> When you use M-: you are not just evaluating a sexp. You are using a command
> that evaluates a sexp and then restores the window selection. If you want to
> test the behavior of `select-window' then don't bring other stuff into the mix
> as well.
So what about
C-x 2
M-: (select-window (next-window))
>> Moreover the modeline of the *scratch* window indicates that
>> the window is selected
>
> Which it is. This is just further proof of that fact.
That I'm "using a command that evaluates a sexp and then restores the
window selection"?
> No, input does not go to the other frame. Not during the evaluation of the
sexp
> given to M-:. It is only _after_ M-: is finished that further input goes to
the
> window that was originally selected.
Even in the C-x 2 example?
>> The problem is within the interaction between Emacs and the window
>> manager. It does not depend on M-:.
>
> What problem? The fact that _after_ M-: the same window is selected as before
> it? That behavior certainly _does_ depend on M-:.
>
> You have not shown any bug in `select-window'.
Indeed.
> You've just gotten confused
> because M-: does not only evaluate a sexp. Take M-: out of the equation and
> then try to demonstrate the supposed `select-window' bug.
It's a bug in the command loop. I can exhibit the same bug using
`select-window' or `select-frame'.
martin
- Re: The window-pub branch, (continued)
- Re: The window-pub branch, grischka, 2010/12/07
- Re: The window-pub branch, martin rudalics, 2010/12/07
- RE: The window-pub branch, Drew Adams, 2010/12/07
- Re: The window-pub branch, grischka, 2010/12/07
- RE: The window-pub branch, Drew Adams, 2010/12/07
- Re: The window-pub branch, martin rudalics, 2010/12/07
- RE: The window-pub branch, Drew Adams, 2010/12/07
- Re: The window-pub branch,
martin rudalics <=
- RE: The window-pub branch, Drew Adams, 2010/12/07