[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Return
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Return |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:44:28 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> Actually, I'm considering to disallow non-top-level defuns in
> lexical-scope mode, just because it's a good opportunity to introduce
> such "breakage" and because non-top-level defuns are bugs in 99% of
> the cases (in Elisp).
So I guess you don't expect to be adding to any hooks in lexical mode?
(add-hook captain-hook (defun sm-or-dak?-style-foo () (foo bar baz)))
;-)
- Re: Return, (continued)
- Re: Return, Fren Zeee, 2010/12/08
- Re: Return, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/09
- Re: Return, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/10
- Re: Return, Fren Zeee, 2010/12/23
- Re: Return,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Return, David Kastrup, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, tomas, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, MON KEY, 2010/12/06
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, David Kastrup, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/07
- Re: Return, Richard Stallman, 2010/12/08
- Re: Return, Daniel Colascione, 2010/12/10
- Keyword args (was: Return), Helmut Eller, 2010/12/10