[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collect-string
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: collect-string |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:47:23 -0800 |
I thought about that too. But this may be the most common usage
without answering one extra question. If the user wants to decorate
the entire match the regexp can be a single big subexpression.
"\\(...\\)"
-Tak
Fri, 3 Dec 2010 14:40:47 -0800: Davis Herring <address@hidden> wrote:
> > ! ;; No subexpression so collect the entire match.
> > ! "\\&"
>
> Once we have the replace-match functionality, I don't think this
> assumption makes sense anymore; the user might want to frame the matches
> with something.
>
> Davis
>
> --
> This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
> too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
> shipping.
>
- Re: collect-string, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/01
- Re: collect-string, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/02
- Re: collect-string, Tak Ota, 2010/12/02
- Re: collect-string, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/03
- Re: collect-string, Tak Ota, 2010/12/03
- Re: collect-string, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/03
- Re: collect-string, Tak Ota, 2010/12/03
- Re: collect-string, Glenn Morris, 2010/12/03