Re: The window-pub branch

[martin rudalics]

> A symbol entry is more specific.

More specific than a buffer name?

> However I'd maybe just put names/regexps/symbols in the same
> structure.  Such as:
>
>    (setq display-buffer-specifiers '(
>       ((a-symbol "*b-name*" (r . "^c-regexp.+"))
>     <specifiers>
>         )
>       ...
>     ))
>
> That way the user can express preferences by the order naturally.

I had that before with symbols 'name and 'regexp.  It didn't look bad in
the customization interface IIRC but seemed more annoying in the printed
specification.  OTOH it allows to give regexp based specifiers higher
priority than name based ones.  Maybe I'll give it another try.

martin