[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key bindings proposal
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
Re: Key bindings proposal |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:34:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
> Dear Juri, Thanks for an excellent summary and putting the life back
> into this thread!
Since you brought up the key binding `M-s a C-s' (added by yours truly)
as an example of the obsession with key bindings, I feel responsible
for your criticism :-)
> Rather, a prefix key like M-x (say, M-z for argument's sake) would be
> used for invoking mode-specific "command names". Each mode would bind
> such command names to actual elisp functions, and this allows us to
> reuse the command names in each mode.
I see, we have mode-specific menus and mode-specific key bindings,
but not mode-specific command names for the M-x namespace.
Maybe it should be not just mode-specific but also context-dependent
in a broader sense. Some programs provide <S-f10> to pop up a context
menu. So Emacs could provide a separate context menu and corresponding
command namespace and key prefixes.
- Re: Key bindings proposal, (continued)
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/25
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juri Linkov, 2010/08/26
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Miles Bader, 2010/08/26
- Re: Key bindings proposal, Juri Linkov, 2010/08/27
- RE: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/27
Re: Key bindings proposal, Andreas Schwab, 2010/08/23
Re: Key bindings proposal, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/27