[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: base
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: base |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:35:56 -0400 |
> From: Uday S Reddy <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:25:03 +0100
>
> Well, isn't this kind of "existence" meta-physical? If it hasn't been
> written
> down, and generally agreed upon by all the participants, what sense does it
> exist in?
I don't need to write down my mental model in order for it to exist.
> To really exist, they have to be used and validated by practice.
My models are used by me, and validated by my practice.
> But, note that simplified models are only starting points. Good
> models have to explain everything that happens.
No, they only need to explain what I need to do for the job at hand.
That's hardly "everything".
> You can start by ignoring air resistance to understand gravity.
> But, don't start flying airplanes without understanding air
> resistance.
Life is short. Not everyone will want or need to fly airplanes.
Those who won't don't need to understand drag.
- Re: base, (continued)
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Miles Bader, 2010/08/25
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Leo, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Uday S Reddy, 2010/08/26
- Re: base,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, David Robinow, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, David Kastrup, 2010/08/26
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/27
- Re: base, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/27
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/28
- Re: base, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/26