[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> According to my reading, it stops the search for point if it is more
> than 10 lines below (resp above) the scroll margin. The reason is
> speed, as the comment says. Can we safely assume that whoever sets
> scroll-conservatively to the maximum value gives up this speed
> consideration?
I think so, yes.
Stefan
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, (continued)
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/06/19
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/19