[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:13:28 -0700 |
> I think having cross references between the four sources
> described above is a great thing. There should be more
> of that today.
According to *your* argument: For any topic, you should be able to find an
explanation of *everything* about that topic (including all possible relations
and ramifications) in *one* place.
According to your argument, cross references are anathema - not even a necessary
evil, but something that can and should be dispensed with.
Do you get it now? Your argument is in fact an argument against *any* doc
organization. It is an argument against cross references and the need for or the
utility of cross references.
- Re: Guile in Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Helmut Eller, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/15
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Lennart Borgman, 2010/04/15
- RE: Guile in Emacs,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/16
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/16
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/16
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/16
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/16
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/16
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/16
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2010/04/17
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/19
- Emacs Info manuals (was: Guile in Emacs), Juri Linkov, 2010/04/16