[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow) |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:30:38 -0400 |
When I read about Sun's plan to make TCL the universal scripting
language, I decided to oppose that. The plan I chose was to implement
Scheme and support other scripting languages by translation into Scheme.
Guile is the program I chose to adopt to do this with. That plan
is what I am talking about.
Whatever history that code had before its adoption for this plan
is not what I am talking about.
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Thomas Lord, 2010/04/11
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Thomas Lord, 2010/04/12
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Bruce Stephens, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Christian Lynbech, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Bruce Stephens, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, joakim, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Christian Lynbech, 2010/04/13
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Thomas Lord, 2010/04/13