[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: d-s-m default: Nil + explanation!
From: |
Davis Herring |
Subject: |
Re: d-s-m default: Nil + explanation! |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 07:21:28 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.7.lanl7 |
>> So you seriously believe that currently it is not possible for a
>> prospective user to do even the simplest editing in Emacs.
>
> Yes I do.
>
> In simple editing I include that the visible region behaves as they do
> in other editing environment. That is something I have seen people
> using very frequently.
But is that "the simplest editing" or merely "simple editing"? The former
is more objective than the latter, because most of us would agree on an
approximate order of complexity among editing operations, but it is quite
arbitrary where to draw the line between "simple" operations and the
others.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- d-s-m default: Nil + explanation! (was: d-s-m default), Memnon Anon, 2010/03/24
- RE: d-s-m default: Nil + explanation!, Drew Adams, 2010/03/25
- Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/25
- Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/03/25
- Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/26
- RE: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, Drew Adams, 2010/03/25
- Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/25
- Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, mathias, 2010/03/26
- RE: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, Drew Adams, 2010/03/26
- Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/26