[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: delete-selection-mode
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: AW: delete-selection-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:04:58 +0100 |
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> shift-selection is an inferior method of marking a region.
That sounds strange. It is the common way for most editing environment
for selecting text.
> We provide
> shift-selection because the keybindings don't conflict with the
> canonical method, but it is a special case.
Is not the main reason to provide it compatibility?
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, (continued)
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2010/03/17
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, David Kastrup, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Chad Brown, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Chad Brown, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/18
- RE: AW: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/18
- RE: AW: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/18
- Re: AW: delete-selection-mode, Juri Linkov, 2010/03/19