[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: bidi branch
|
From: |
Drew Adams |
|
Subject: |
RE: bidi branch |
|
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:39:40 -0800 |
> > IMO, it doesn't make sense to publish code that wasn't yet made to
> > compile on anything but GNU/Windows (i.e., the Windows build will be
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
> That'd be the day ;-) I meant GNU/Linux, of course...
Oy vey! We're gonna have to send you back for regrooving, Eli. ;-)
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, (continued)
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Andreas Schwab, 2010/03/11
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, James Cloos, 2010/03/11
- Re: bidi branch (was: Emacs-23 release branch), Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/12
- Re: bidi branch, James Cloos, 2010/03/13
- Re: bidi branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/13
- Re: bidi branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/13
- RE: bidi branch,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: bidi branch, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/15
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/11
- Re: bidi branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/12
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Andreas Schwab, 2010/03/12
- Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/12
Re: Emacs-23 release branch, Michael Albinus, 2010/03/10