[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Next pretest, and branching plans
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Next pretest, and branching plans |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:39:13 -0800 |
> > Related to this is the fact that bug #5299, a regression,
> > is still outstanding. It prevents Windows users from
> > using `M-x report-emacs-bug' to file bugs.
>
> I don't know what to fix there. Email never worked for me on Windows
> without some setup. I use smtpmail, but it will not work without
> setting it up for your ISP's mail server.
>
> So, for me, there's no regression: it never worked in previous
> versions of Emacs, and it does not work now.
>
> Lennart seems to know what kind of solution worked for you in the
> past, so perhaps Lennart could try fixing that, or at least describing
> what changed in Emacs that broke that solution, whatever it is. I
> don't have Outlook set up to even try what you describe.
(Perhaps this really belongs in the bug #5299 thread?)
I have no idea what problems you had previously, or what caused the recent
problem.
But I can (and do) use `M-x report-emacs-bug' fine with Emacs releases 22 and 23
(and with pretests, before I reported the bug). It works fine in those releases
(still).
My mail client is Outlook, but I don't know if your mail client has anything to
do with your problems using `M-x report-emacs-bug'.
Something was changed since the Emacs 23.1 release, so that this became broken.
It _is_ a regression, at least for my use case with an external mail client
(Outlook). If it never worked for you, that's unfortunate, but that does not
mean that it never worked.
I don't think (but I don't know) that whatever enabled `report-emacs-bug' to
work previously was Outlook-specific. It might have been something
Windows-specific (dunno). It might have been something specific for use with an
external mail client (any external client) - dunno. But I doubt that it was
something Outlook-specific.
- Next pretest, and branching plans, Chong Yidong, 2010/02/18
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans, Drew Adams, 2010/02/18
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Leo, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Sean Sieger, 2010/02/20
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans, Drew Adams, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Sean Sieger, 2010/02/28
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Lennart Borgman, 2010/02/28
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans, Drew Adams, 2010/02/20
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans, Drew Adams, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/20
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Lennart Borgman, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Lennart Borgman, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/20
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans, Drew Adams, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Chong Yidong, 2010/02/20
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans, Drew Adams, 2010/02/20
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Lennart Borgman, 2010/02/20
- RE: Next pretest, and branching plans, Drew Adams, 2010/02/20