[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:38:30 -0500 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, "Mark A. Hershberger" <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:02:46 -0500
>
> I've just added
>
> append_revisions_only = True
>
> to the .../trunk/.bzr/branch/branch.conf which should reject a "bzr
> push" that does this kind of ancestor-shifting.
Are you sure we understand the consequences enough to make such a fast
decision without testing it first? What was the rush?
- Re: merge conlict?, (continued)
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Richard Stallman, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/26
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Teemu Likonen, 2010/01/25
Interpreting git diff --cc [was: merge conlict?], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/25