[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge conlict?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: merge conlict? |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:30:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> Not much different from
>>> eg. address@hidden
>>
>> That merge is made of Katsumi Yamaoka's changes.
>
> I don't understand that sentence. Can you clarify?
>
>> Which is not true for Mark's merge.
>
> Both commits merge trunk into a branch. How are they different?
Katsumi Yamaoka merges his changes into trunk, which is the normal
practice.
If my guess is right, Mark merged trunk into his private branch, and
then pushed to upstream, which is very wrong.
- Re: NEVER use `bzr push' for sending changes upstream, (continued)
Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
- Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Teemu Likonen, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/25
Re: merge conlict?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/25