[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer'
|
From: |
Harald Hanche-Olsen |
|
Subject: |
Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer' |
|
Date: |
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:44:16 -0500 (EST) |
Ah, I had utterly missed the existence of window-point - though
something like it obviously must exist, for multiple windows on the
same buffer to work right. Thanks for the explanation. You can return
to the original topic of discussion now, and I'll go back to lurking.
Sorry about the noise.
- Harald
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', (continued)
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', David Kastrup, 2010/01/10
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/10
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', David Kastrup, 2010/01/11
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', martin rudalics, 2010/01/11
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/11
- RE: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Drew Adams, 2010/01/10
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/09
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2010/01/10
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', martin rudalics, 2010/01/10
- RE: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Drew Adams, 2010/01/10
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer',
Harald Hanche-Olsen <=
Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Davis Herring, 2010/01/04