Re: bugtracker sets bad Mail-Followup-To

[Stefan Monnier]

> It's an attempt to reduce the massive mail duplication that existed
> before, when people kept replying to nnn@ and bug-gnu-emacs.

> Is the right thing to do:

> 1) When I reply to nnn@, the mail that debbugs sends out should have
> neither MFT nor RT in the headers. Then people can just followup as
> normal.

> 2) When I send a new mail to bug-gnu-emacs or submit@, the new report
> that goes out should either:

> a) Have MFT set to nnn@, and no RT header (same as at present, bug
> remove RT).

> b) Have To: set to nnn@ rather than bug-gnu-emacs. (I think this is
> preferable?)

> If so, I will _try_ to implement it.

IMO, the "right" thing to do is to replace address@hidden and
address@hidden by address@hidden everywhere in the
headers.


        Stefan