[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881 |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 06:14:46 +0200 |
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:43:44 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 19:15, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Type
> >
> > bzr log -r "revid:address@hidden"
> >
> > and see there what syntax I used.
> >
> > It's the same syntax as in "bzr whoami", I simply submitted the string
> > you see in the log of the above revision, enclosed in quotes.
>
> The syntax was clear
Sorry for my misunderstanding.
> I was asking about semantics. I see that a bzr log and qlog show the
> author and not the committer; surely that's all?
For me, it shows both the author and the committer:
revno: 99248
revision-id: address@hidden
parent: address@hidden
author: Kevin Ryde <address@hidden>
committer: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Sat 2010-01-02 23:33:36 +0200
message:
eieio.texi (Naming Conventions): Correction to xref on elisp
coding conventions, is "Tips" node not "Standards".
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/05
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/05
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/05
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/05
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/06
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/06
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/06
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/07
Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/05
Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/05
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/01/06
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/06
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/01/06
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/06
- Re: bug#881: patch for bug #881, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/01/07