[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:32:58 +0900 |
David Kastrup writes:
> I don't see why "state of the repository at time point x" is relevant
> for anything.
*shrug* Stefan asked about "consistency", I explained. The remarks
labelled "IMO" should be construed to mean I agree with you about
relevance.
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, (continued)
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Andreas Schwab, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, David Kastrup, 2009/12/10
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Steven Knight, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Jan Djärv, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Steven Knight, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Jan Djärv, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Steven Knight, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Jan D., 2009/12/11
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Steven Knight, 2009/12/11
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Jan D., 2009/12/11
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Jan Djärv, 2009/12/12
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Steven Knight, 2009/12/14