[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: C-j considered harmful (not really)
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: C-j considered harmful (not really) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:05:45 -0800 |
> Right. I'd like to see that as another question (regardless of whether
> S-return = C-j or not), that it's unnecessary to have both RET and
> C-j for minibuffer-complete-and-exit, so it would be better to have
> C-j do newline there.
>
> Probably some people are used to using C-j there?
Yes, in Icicles, `C-j' is self-inserting in the minibuffer. Likewise `SPC' and
`?'. Why? Because in Icicles it is not rare for completions or input text to
contain such chars.
- C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/16
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/16
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/17
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Deniz Dogan, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/22
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/23
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really),
Drew Adams <=
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really), Drew Adams, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Per Starbäck, 2009/11/23
- Re: C-j considered harmful (not really), Juri Linkov, 2009/11/24
- RE: C-j considered harmful (not really), Drew Adams, 2009/11/24