[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Case mapping of sharp s
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Case mapping of sharp s |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:49:53 +0900 |
In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > That kind of setting surely makes the searching of ß and ẞ
> > slow because we can't use BM search when case-fold-search is
> > non-nil. BM search is possible only when all
> > case-equivalent characters are represented by the same byte
> > length, and differ only in the last byte.
> I think we need to solve this limitation anyway, if we want a decent
> support for Unicode. There are many more pairs of characters that
> should normally be considered equal in search.
I agree.
> Wouldn't the technique described in UTS 18
> (http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr18/) help here?
Which technique do you mean? That report mostly describes
just rules of matching, not about fast implementation.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Case mapping of sharp s, Ulrich Mueller, 2009/11/15
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Kenichi Handa, 2009/11/16
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/16
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/17
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Kenichi Handa, 2009/11/17
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/17
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/18
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Kenichi Handa, 2009/11/18
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Ulrich Mueller, 2009/11/18
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/18
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/18