[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:20:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan> An important feature for me is that this should be able to "install
Stefan> without making available"
> ... but not this.
That's what I remembered, indeed. Could you change it?
Stefan> So basically, the installation process would distinguish the following
Stefan> steps:
Stefan> - install: may include byte-compiling and things like that
Stefan> - activate: eval the autoload declarations, adjust the load-path, ...
Stefan> - make available: setup the .emacs so that the package gets activated
Stefan> at startup.
> package.el does this.
You mean that it "does" all those steps, right?
Not that it "distinguishes" them, right? IOW, it collapses "activate"
and "make available" into a single entity.
Stefan
- Re: Emacs Package Management, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Phil Hagelberg, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Chong Yidong, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Phil Hagelberg, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/30
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/30