[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!) |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:57:20 +0300 |
> Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:54:11 +0200
> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Eli Zaretskii<address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:21:46 +0200
> >> From: Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> >>
> >> > I'm saying that subgroups called "advanced" are bad.
> >>
> >> You said
> >>
> >> In a good UI, each feature should be put under a group whose name
> >> gives a hint that the feature could be reasonably looked up in that
> >> group. Having group names such as "Advanced" or "More options", that
> >> have no mnemonic value, is abusing the menus, which are supposed to
> >> make the job of finding a feature _easier_, not harder.
> >
> > Yes, and that goes for subgroups as well.
>
>
> And the reason?
But you just quoted me explaining that, see above!
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), (continued)
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/08
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus, Jason Rumney, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus, Jason Rumney, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus (was: bug#4043: 23.1; thanks for emacs 23!), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/09
- Re: Fiddling with the menus, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/09