[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay]
From: |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu |
Subject: |
Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay] |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:06:26 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shijō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:13:43 +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden>
>>>>> said:
>>>> This does not work properly on X. With that change, there are
>>>> frame exposure problems using the recipe from
>>>
>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg01201.html
>>>
>>>> (i.e., when the dialog box is moved, the underlying frame is not
>>>> drawn properly.) However, I have not had time to debug further.
>>>
>>> Just to be sure, that doesn't happen if Fredisplay is called from
>>> the original position?
>> Correct. The current version works properly; moving the Fredisplay
>> call earlier leads to uncorrect display.
> Perhaps `menu_items' or something like that is corrupted by the
> Fredisplay call? Could you try the following patch?
I tried it myself with Ubuntu 8.10, GTK+ (as I could not reproduce the
redraw-failure with X11 on Mac OS X, Xaw). It sometimes failed in
redrawing with each of three Fredisplay call positions, including the
original one. So I think this is a separate issue.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/03/15
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], David Reitter, 2009/03/16
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], Chong Yidong, 2009/03/16
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/03/16
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], Chong Yidong, 2009/03/16
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/03/17
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay],
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <=
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], Chong Yidong, 2009/03/17
- Re: address@hidden: Re: redisplay], YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2009/03/18