Re: buffer-swap-text and multibyteness

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:57:26 -0500
> 
> >> >> In my poiunt of view, the way "edit" should work is that it should
> >> >> basically be put into `message-mode' and then "saving" would simply
> >> >> encode the whole message (as if preparing to send it).
> >> > I'm not sure this isn't an overkill.
> >> 
> >> Not sure why you'd think so.
> 
> > When did you last look at the code you were describing?  It does a lot
> > more then just encode the message and add/rewrite the Content-Type
> > headers.
> 
> But... why do you think this "a lot more" is not needed/useful in the
> case of rmailedit?

Because rmailedit never sends any message, so it does not need most of
that stuff.