[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: docstrings in dired.el
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: docstrings in dired.el |
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2008 12:12:36 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 06:43:18 +0200
> From: "Roland Winkler" <address@hidden>
>
> I am trying to develop proced.el in analogy with dired.el.
Thanks. But while at that, could you also please change proced.el to
not rely on an external program such as `ps', at least not explicitly?
Every modern OS has APIs to access the same information as `ps' does;
providing primitives to do that from Lisp will make proced.el much
more portable than it is currently, and I think it will also be
faster. The hodgepodge of OS-specific options we have in proced.el at
this time is really ugly, IMO.
TIA
- docstrings in dired.el, Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: docstrings in dired.el, David Kastrup, 2008/05/23
- Re: docstrings in dired.el, Michael Olson, 2008/05/23
- Re: docstrings in dired.el,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Roland Winkler, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24