Re: (interactive "...") : What goes in, what does not ?

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Is there a reason why some input
>> reading methods have a code letter for interactive and some not ?

> Sorry to bump this question, but I'm still wondering. In case there is
> no clear policy about it, how would you like a patch to provide code
> letter for commonly used prompt that does not have their own code
> letter yet, please ?

Code letters were important when built-in functions couldn't use Elisp
forms as interactive specs.  Now that they can use Elisp code as well,
it is less important.


        Stefan