[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lexbind
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: lexbind |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:03:25 -0500 |
> I am not sure `defvar' is enough. The reason is that using it to fix
> existing packages may require renaming.
Yes, it may require renaming. It's usually not a big deal, tho.
I think we would be better off also having other mechanisms
for doing this, which do not require renaming.
- Re: lexbind, (continued)
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/03/05
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/05
- Re: lexbind, paul r, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, Stefan Monnier, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/03/14
- Re: lexbind, David De La Harpe Golden, 2008/03/03
- Re: lexbind,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lexbind, Miles Bader, 2008/03/04
- Re: lexbind, Richard Stallman, 2008/03/05