[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:33:18 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
> > Do we need to fix the build without it (which currently fails on
> > Windows), or should we make --enable-font-backend the default?
> >
> I think the original plan was to make the new font backend the default
> after the initial flood of post-merge bug reports died down, but if the
> old font code is going to be a major source of such reports, maybe it is
> better to make it the default sooner.
I agree.
And I also had the plan of deleting regacy font handling
codes as soon as it is supported also on non-Unix
non-GNU-Linux system (i.e. Windows and Mac). When Emacs.app
(Mac Cocoa port) is merged into the trunk, I'd like to start
working on it.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Zhang Wei, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/02
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Jason Rumney, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Miles Bader, 2008/02/04
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/02/05
- Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2008/02/06
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Zhang Wei, 2008/02/02
Re: Emacs costs 100M memory on Windows XP, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/02/02