[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tabbed buffers
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: Tabbed buffers |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:10:05 +1300 |
> > I don't agree, there seems to a direct correspondence with creating a new
> > frame:
>
> Er, but creating a new frame is an explicit user action, and somewhat
> heavyweight...
I'm not sure what you mean by heavyweight but it sounds negative. If you just
mean the user must do something like press some keys or click the mouse then
that's true for most of Emacs. If he would prefer a more passive experience
he really needs to find another activity like watching television.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- Re: Tabbed buffers, (continued)
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Chong Yidong, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Miles Bader, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Miles Bader, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/01/26
- Re: Tabbed buffers, T. V. Raman, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Robert J. Chassell, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/27
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Richard Stallman, 2008/01/28
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/01/28
- Re: Tabbed buffers, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/28