[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: State of VC?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: State of VC? |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:19 -0500 |
The third argument to get-buffer-window really should not be optional,
to force people to think a bit more about the multi-frame case, which is
all too often ignored.
That is a good point, but I think such a change would break lots of
old code, and thus is a bad idea.
- State of VC?, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Glenn Morris, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Johan Bockgård, 2008/01/23
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: State of VC?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/25
- Re: State of VC?, Alexandru Harsanyi, 2008/01/26
- Re: State of VC?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/22
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/23
- Re: State of VC?, Tom Tromey, 2008/01/24
- Re: State of VC?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/26
- Re: State of VC?, Eric S. Raymond, 2008/01/26