[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:31:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden>:
> I suspect that 90% of the difference in "responsiveness" between the two
> projects has to do with the people (and numbers of people) involved, not
> with the tools being used.
I don't think those are separable -- I think Wesnoth has more developers
in significant part *because* its tools are better.
> Certainly the tools make _some_ difference, but I think ESR is
> drastically overestimating how much of one.
You may be right. But we won't know until we fix our toolset and see,
and fixing our toolset would have important benefits even at our
current scale.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, (continued)
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/31
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Miles Bader, 2007/12/31
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/31
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Miles Bader, 2007/12/31
- Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/31
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Alan Mackenzie, 2007/12/31
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/12/31
Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/31