[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Uninformative comment in files.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Uninformative comment in files.el |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Dec 2007 15:49:39 -0500 |
Maybe it would. Or maybe the package knows how to deal with that (it
wants the overlay to cover the whole buffer, for instance, and sets the
marker's advance-after property appropriately) or it just needs to keep
the overlay-buffer info to know in which buffer is the overlay.
Those are pretty silly ways to use an overlay. I won't say it is inconceivable
that any package does this, but I think it is not sufficient reason
to forego fixing this problem.
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, (continued)
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/12/12
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Stefan Monnier, 2007/12/12
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/12/12
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/13
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Stefan Monnier, 2007/12/13
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, martin rudalics, 2007/12/13
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, David Kastrup, 2007/12/13
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/15
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/12/16
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/17
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/14
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Stefan Monnier, 2007/12/20
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/21
- Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Stefan Monnier, 2007/12/22
Re: Uninformative comment in files.el, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/12