[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Dec 2007 23:51:17 +0100 |
On Dec 4, 2007 10:32 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> When saving history, there's nothing to decide: savehist uses a
> temporary buffer, which is born with the native EOL convention of the
> underlying platform: -unix on Posix platforms, -dos on Windows.
I don't understand. Wouldn't a -unix coding force it to be saved with
Unix EOL convention?
> So you mean when reading the history file, yes?
Well, I do "M-x replace-string ^M^J <RET> ^J <RET>", and the savehist
file contains 0x0D 0x0A and 0x0D 0x0D 0x0A.
> What would help, I think, is have an explicit EOL
> conversion stated in the coding: cookie.
We are miscommunicating somehow. The value of `savehist-coding-system'
is used to write the file, and is also written in the coding: cookie.
When I propose to use a -unix variant to write the file, I of course
mean to also write it in the cookie.
Juanma
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, (continued)
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/04
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/12/04
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/04
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Stefan Monnier, 2007/12/04
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/04
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/12/05
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/05
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/12/05
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/12/05
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/12/06
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: saveplace: don't ask for coding system, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/04