[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another VC terminology change?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Another VC terminology change? |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:14:52 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:30:05 -0400
> From: "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden>
>
> The terms ``checkin'' and ``checkout'' are associated with file-based
> and locking-based systems and a bit archaic; nowadays those operations
> are usually called ``commit'' and ``update''.
>
> Since I've had to take a big hammer to VC's terminology anyway to clean up the
> inconsistencies Stefan pointed out, I'm thinking now might be a good time
> for me to go further and change these.
>
> The argument against, of course, is that users are accustomed to these
> terms. They're embedded in VC because when I originally wrote it SCCS
> and RCS were the only games in town[1] and these are the terms they used.
>
> The argument for is that 'commit' and 'update' are a better match for the
> terms CVS introduced and every subsequent VCS we're interested in has pretty
> much retained.
How about making the replacement, but adding a footnote saying that
some older VCS backends call these operations ``checkin'' and
``checkout''?
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, (continued)
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Miles Bader, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/13
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/14
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/15
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/18
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/19
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/21
Re: Another VC terminology change?,
Eli Zaretskii <=