[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: un-deprecating CL
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: un-deprecating CL |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Sep 2007 18:32:58 -0400 |
> As for mapcar, it is pretty slow already, and the main cost is in
> calling the user's function. That won't get any slower.
Then again: how many uses of mapcar* have you encountered?
If you object to `union' because it's not used often, I'd expect you to
reject the vararg version of mapcar.
The issues are not similar. One is adding a new function.
The other is a simple, natural extension in an existing function.
The former costs more, in complexity.
- Re: un-deprecating CL, (continued)
- Re: un-deprecating CL, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Johan Bockgård, 2007/09/20
- Re: un-deprecating CL,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, T. V. Raman, 2007/09/15
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Joe Wells, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18