[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: un-deprecating CL
From: |
Johan Bockgård |
Subject: |
Re: un-deprecating CL |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:43:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
David O'Toole <address@hidden> writes:
> Furthermore, if the defaults are not `nil' then you also have to look
> up what are acceptable values to pass for the arguments that you did
> not want to specify in the first place.
But in Emacs Lisp (unlike CL) optional arguments always default to nil.
--
Johan Bockgård
- Re: un-deprecating CL, (continued)
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/18
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/19
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/19
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: un-deprecating CL,
Johan Bockgård <=
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, David O'Toole, 2007/09/16
- Re: un-deprecating CL, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/16