[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line ch
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:06:14 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> Thanks. But I still wonder: why would anybody use "-c0" or "-u0"?
For ChangeLogs, which rarely apply if they have any context. The
unidiff format is preferred by XEmacs because it provides the headers
which identify the ChangeLog exactly. I don't think it hurts that all
patches are in the same format.
Not a big deal, but since it's trivial to do, why not?
> If you don't want context, then you're better off with the plain or `ed'
> diff formats, no?
If you remember how to read them. :-) I only ever see those in patch
.rej files.
- diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Chris Moore, 2007/09/08
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/09
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Chris Moore, 2007/09/10
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/10
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/09/11
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/13
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Glenn Morris, 2007/09/13
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/13
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/13
- Re: diff-mode doesn't like "-c0" or "-u0" diff output for single-line changes, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/09/13