[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Split man directory
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Split man directory |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:45:15 -0400 |
Indeed. But instead of `man', why not use the GNU-standard `doc'?
Thus, we will have
doc/emacs
doc/lispref
doc/lispintro
doc/contrib (for other manuals)
This is fine with me (I agree with the person who said `misc' is better
than `contrib').
I just wonder whether the added cleanness of creating a directory to
hold these four dirs outweights the disadvantage of moving them down
one level. If there were many of them, such as 8, then it would be
clearly yes. With just 4, it might be more annoyance than it is worth.
- Re: Split man directory, (continued)
- Re: Split man directory, Glenn Morris, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, Ralf Angeli, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, Leo, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, David Kastrup, 2007/09/03
- Re: Split man directory, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, David Kastrup, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, Stephen Berman, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, Miles Bader, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Split man directory, Juri Linkov, 2007/09/04
- Re: Split man directory, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/05
- Splitting gnus.texi (was: Split man directory), Reiner Steib, 2007/09/24
- Re: Splitting gnus.texi (was: Split man directory), Richard Stallman, 2007/09/25
- Re: Splitting gnus.texi, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2007/09/25
- Re: Splitting gnus.texi, Reiner Steib, 2007/09/26
- Re: Splitting gnus.texi, Giorgos Keramidas, 2007/09/30
- Re: Splitting gnus.texi, Reiner Steib, 2007/09/30
- Re: Splitting gnus.texi, Giorgos Keramidas, 2007/09/30
- Re: Splitting gnus.texi, Juri Linkov, 2007/09/26