Re: [PATCH] New convenience macros

[Johan Bockgård]

Steve Youngs <address@hidden> writes:

> However, there are situations where this optimisation won't work,
> here's an example...
>
>   (if (and (featurep 'simple) (featurep 'xemacs)) a b)
>
> warns about free variables for both `a' and `b'.  So I think having the
> macros as well as the optimisation is a good idea.

It does the right thing if you reverse the order of the feature tests.

The compiler could do better though.

-- 
Johan Bockgård