[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SVG support(again) ?
From: |
Mathias Dahl |
Subject: |
Re: SVG support(again) ? |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Aug 2007 09:11:32 +0200 |
> - I looked through the code briefly, and it didnt seem too bad on the
> commenting. Was it anything in particular you thought needed
> clarification?
>
> There are functions that don't even have a comment at the beginning to
> say what they do and how to call them. It needs a lot of improvement
> in comments.
This is why I like M-x checkdoc RET so much :)
- SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/08
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/09
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/11
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/14
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/14
- Re: SVG support(again) ?,
Mathias Dahl <=
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/16
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/16
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/18
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/18
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/19
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/19
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/20
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/21
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, joakim, 2007/08/21
- Re: SVG support(again) ?, Glenn Morris, 2007/08/22