[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: source repository
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: source repository |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jul 2007 21:30:50 -0400 |
How many developers are in this boat, I don't
know. Can Emacs afford to ignore even one?
There's more at stake here than a few developers more or less.
And some of it is imponderable, such as this:
[1] Of course this would require some work by FSF legal, but I see no
reason why it would be impossible to write an appropriate assignment
instrument, and enforce it with appropriate commit hooks.
To think about this would take a lot of time, and it would be easy
to be wrong. There is no need to spend time and take a risk
where nothing is actually broken.
The easy thing to do is to stay with CVS, so we will do that.
I will ask the savannah hackers and sysadmins to look at making
port 443 access available again. That would help some people
and doesn't raise any hard issues.
- Re: source repository, (continued)
- Re: source repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/03
- Re: source repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Nick Roberts, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, David Kastrup, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, dhruva, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, David Kastrup, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: source repository, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, David Kastrup, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/07/04
- merge of multi-tty (was: source repository), Reiner Steib, 2007/07/07
- merge of multi-tty (was: source repository), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/07/07
- Re: merge of multi-tty (was: source repository), Richard Stallman, 2007/07/08
- Re: merge of multi-tty, Stefan Monnier, 2007/07/08
- Re: merge of multi-tty, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/09
- Re: source repository, Giorgos Keramidas, 2007/07/17
- Re: source repository, dhruva, 2007/07/17