[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs) |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:49:18 -0400 |
;; You can get the standard Emacs "prefix" completion, instead of=0A=
;; this "apropos completion", by using `TAB' instead of `S-TAB'. You=0A=
;; can cycle prefix-completion candidates by using the `up' and=0A=
;; `down' arrow keys instead of `next' and `prior'.=0A=
That feature conflicts with a standard one. `up' and `down' in the
minibuffer move thru the history; that works for all minibuffer
arguments, with or without completion.
So if we are to install this feature, it needs to be on other keys.
;; C-h f c h a r S-TAB - display all function names that contain=0A=
;; `char'.=0A=
;;=0A=
;; M-* d e l e t e - narrow that set of names to those that also=0A=
;; contain `delete'.=0A=
I wonder if it would be more convenient to interpret
some syntax for this, such as `char&delete'
- Re: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs), Richard Stallman, 2007/06/17
- RE: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs), Drew Adams, 2007/06/17
- Re: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs), Richard Stallman, 2007/06/24
- RE: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs), Drew Adams, 2007/06/24
- Re: Icicles doc - file 1/2, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/25
- RE: Icicles doc - file 1/2, Drew Adams, 2007/06/25
- Re: Icicles doc - file 1/2 (was: propose adding Icicles to Emacs), Richard Stallman, 2007/06/25