[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:57:34 +0900 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Well, it is not as much an interface rather than exposed internals.
> There is no reason, for example, that one needs to write
>
> (let ((process-environment (copy-sequence process-environment)))
> (setenv ...
> )
Well, nobody actually writes that though.
People write:
(let ((process-environment (cons ... process-environment)))
...)
Which is a documented interface, is very convenient, and works pretty well.
-Miles
--
`There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.'
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Chong Yidong, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Michael Albinus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/13